Fag! You’re it

Din motive evidente – pur si simplu nu pot traduce cuvantul “fag” in romana si sa aiba acelasi sens ca in varianta de faţă pentru orice context – am fost nevoit sa scriu acest articol in engleza. Imi cer scuze pentru inconvenient.

If you’re a fan of South Park, you probably know, by now, that on the historic date of October 21st, 2009 (whole episode here) they changed the meaning of the word “fag”.

This is not as crazy as you may think, since the word “faggot”, or “fag” changed its meaning quite a few times throughout history, for example:

  • an old or unpleasant woman
  • used as an insult to poor people
  • used as an insult to old people
  • etc.

Finally, nowadays it’s used as an offensive term against homosexuals.

Well, not anymore it isn’t. :D

You know how some bikers like to make a lot of noise in order to get noticed? At first you kinda like them or get tricked into thinking you like them by your impressionable friends. So you are intrigued by them, you think they’re pretty cool but, as you grow up and you become wiser, you realise that bikers that make a lot of noise are actually immature, attention seeking douchebags.

So you’re thinking: “GOD, these are such fags!”. Does this make sense to you? Cause it makes insanely good sense to me:

Hopefully this made things clear for you. Now, I think it’s fair to say that one doesn’t have to ride a Harley in order to be a huge faggot. If you blog, you may find that faggots are closer than you think, some of them even reside in your blogroll. Beware. These fags like getting a lil’ crazy sometimes, riding their Wordpress or Blogspot engines.

So which bloggers that we thought were pretty cool are actually attention-seeking, noise-making fags?

Besides Fag20, our local gang of bullies?
Ironically, this is a bunch of homophobic fags, as some of you pointed out.
Let’s see..

1. Radu, piticigratis.com

Why I thought he was pretty cool at first: the “70 sexual positions” series is simply hilarious. The “galloping wheelbarrow” is one of the funniest things I’ve ever read. In fact, I was such a fan, that at one point I invented a sexual position called “the helicopter man and the helipad woman” using that style and shyly posted it as a comment, here.
Why he’s a douchebag: well, I think it became pretty obvious to everyone, except his herd of loyal commenters (I like to call them fag-aides), that he’s a jerk. He’s kinda like Mircea Badea – “everyone sucks, but me”, except for the much, much, MUCH fouler language. I think he reaches a new level of fagness everytime he uses the word “dick”. And he uses that word alot, for fuck’s sake.
How many calories are burnt: what?

2. Bad Pitzi, pitzipoanca.org

In this fag’s case.. Uhm, wait-wait.. maybe the proper term for a lady-douchebag is fagess, although there are many people claiming she’s actually a dragqueen (at least in her.. his online performance). It’s not Bad Pitzi’s fault that he.. she.. they became a fag. They made a lot of noise from the beginning and there was a time when pitzipoanca.org was a pretty cool site. Really, it’s not their fault. It’s simply that it got really old, really fast seeing the same type of pictures and jokes over and over again. Now that site is useless, except for the handsome 5% quota in the Fag Father’s ZeFagList score.

3. Adrian Soare, succesdublu.ro

Yes, I thought he was pretty cool. For a long, long time. Until I realised that he doesn’t DO anything. That’s not how you inspire people, jerk! succesdublu.ro is simply a “1000 ways you can tell your readers to get up and do something about their lives and tricking them into thinking they’re changed while their asses are still stuck to the freaking chair” blog. But they’re just words. Like them peacocking biker fags (N.R. “to peacock = to exhibit oneself vainly”) he associates himself with wonderful people. He posts impressive clips/quotes/etc. of people that actually did something, while adding his ego-inflated words. What a fag..

4. Mircea Popescu, polimedia.us/trilema

This is one of the biggest fags I know, but, to be honest I actually like this faggot. Why? Because he picks on other fags. Why I thought he was cool at first? Because he posts pictures of women’s cleavage on his blog. Why is he an arrogant douche? Because he posts pictures of women’s cleavage, thus making him a fag, aren’t you paying attention? Also, his methods are pretty unorthodox.

These are just a few examples. There are a lot more fags in the Faggosphere and I’d like to hear your proposals for the 2009 Biggest Fag award (except Tom Cruise, he’s the biggest fag in history).

Voteaza articolul pe FTW

Good night, I’m fagged out (N.R. extenuat) by them loud, insecure fags.

Disclaimer: if you don’t know what a “pamflet” is and you somehow find this article offensive, then you’re a huge fag. Hmm, or maybe plain vanilla stupid. Stupid fag!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars6 Stars7 Stars (6 votes, average: 7.00 out of 7)
Loading ... Loading ...


    Articole asemanatoare:
  1. Daca nu votezi acest articol, voi omori cainele!

This entry was posted in Type-in comedy and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

39 Comments

  1. Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    “did noise” nu exista in engleza, e “make/made noise” intotdeauna. Mai sunt chestii de-astea, ceea ce ma face sa cred ca problema mare nu era cum sa-l traduci din engleza, puteai foarte bine sa nu-l traduci in engleza, si sa-l slefuiesti in romana.

    Chestia cu limbile straine e cam asa : daca ai o idee, si nu-ti place cum suna exprimata in limba ta materna, dar ti se pare ca suna mult mai bine intr-o limba straina, asta nu-i pentru ca de fapt chiar suna mai bine, ci pentru ca fiind o limba straina, esti suficient de surd ca sa nu auzi/nu stii cat de prost suna de fapt. O capcana de evitat.

  2. Catalin
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Pai am scris peste tot “make noise”. Daca am scris “did” undeva, a fost o scapare. Desi la search nu am gasit nimic. Sa mai sap.
    Deja mi-ai ras articolul de pe fain? :)

  3. Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:23 pm | Permalink

    Hahaha! Acu vad c-am ajuns si pe lista. Mnoa. Cleavage e intotdeauna singular, si ba pe-a ma-tii!!! :D

  4. Catalin
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    :D
    Merci, corectez. Totusi, unde am pus “did noise”?

  5. Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    “They did a lot of noise”

    Mei, daca-i pentru limba romana, eu ce sa-ti fac ? Hm ?

  6. Catalin
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    Am gasit intre timp – cautam dupa “did noise”, in loc sa caut dupa “noise”, simplu. Mai scrisesem si “cleavege” in loc de “cleavage”. Daaamn, trebuia sa aloc cateva minute si pentru proof-reading. :|

  7. Catalin
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    PS. pai sa-mi faci o exceptie. :P
    Precedentul a fost stabilit. :D

  8. Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    Nu exista exceptii, ce rost ar avea ?

    Si care precedent ?

  9. Catalin
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 11:56 pm | Permalink
  10. Posted November 11, 2009 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    Mai sunt ? :)

  11. Catalin
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    Jeeee, thanks. :P

  12. Posted November 11, 2009 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    ete proasta! nu stie engleza da scrie in ea. uite un nou exemplu de fag, sau gheu cum ii zic io. proasta satului care o arde poliglot desi stie cam cata engleza depaseam eu acu 10 ani. sictir.

  13. Catalin
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 9:52 am | Permalink

    Fag.
    PS. N-avea sens sa mai bag un disclaimer: si eu am fost fag scriind articolul asta. :D

  14. Posted November 11, 2009 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    Nu, măi Cătălin! N-ai înţeles. Tu eşti fag, că el nu e! Doar aşa o zîs pulifricigratis ăsta. :D

  15. Posted November 11, 2009 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    Aoleu! :lol: South Park rulzzzz! Frate da’ ce i-ai lovit pe astia! :P

  16. Posted November 11, 2009 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    În orice caz, foarte urît! :P Şi deloc deontologic!!

    :) ))

  17. Catalin
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    @alphadog.. dar eu recunosc ca sunt fag cateodata, ca fac si eu galagie cu unele articole. Doar ca Radu s-a legat de o chestie care nu are legatura cu articolul in sine. E tipica asta cu distragerea atentiei de la subiectul in discutie. La fel s-a intamplat si in cazul celuilalt articol scris in engleza, daca urmaresti primele comentarii.
    Nevertheless, acest post _este_ un pamflet. Nu am ciuda pe cei mentionati. Ca sa nu zic ca aveam o lista mult mai mare din care puteam alege, dar s-a nimerit sa-i aleg pe ei. Puteam supara, la fel de usor, si alte persoane.

  18. Catalin
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    @Florin.. they do rule. Episodul asta e atat de reusit, incat nu m-ar mira sa afecteze negativ vanzarile de Harley pe viitor si sa influenteze perceptia lumii la adresa bikerilor galagiosi. :)
    @alphadog.. dar deloc! Desi, daca stau sa ma gandesc, bloggingul si deontologia nu merg mana-n mana, tocmai de-asta imi place. :)
    Good thing I’m not a professional blogger. :P

  19. Posted November 11, 2009 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Romanii stiu de gluma, de pamflet nu sunt sigura, ca nu l-ai scris in engleza :) ))) Ai grija pe cine-ti pui in cap cu textu asta…

  20. Catalin
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    @Moretta.. nu am inteles poanta: “de pamflet nu sunt sigura, ca nu l-ai scris in engleza”.
    Cat despre a doua afirmatie: eteee, fleosc. :)
    Pe cine sa-mi pun in cap? Pe Bad Pitzi? O sa scormoneasca o poza mai de cocalar cu mine? :P
    Mircea, dupa cum ai observat, stie de gluma, e mai rezonabil decat pare.
    Radu n-o sa-mi dea mai multa importanta decat a facut-o prin acel comentariu. Poate cand voi avea mai multi cititori, atunci va fi in interesul lui.
    Iar Adrian nu se baga in conflicte de-astea.

    Desi ar fi interesant sa ma insel, avand in vedere cat ma pot plictisi in ultima vreme. :D

  21. Posted November 11, 2009 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    Ai câştigat toţi interneţii anului 2009.

  22. Catalin
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    Multumim. :) )
    Merci si de RT.

  23. Narcisa
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    1. e imbucurator sa vad un blogger (chiar si neprofesionist, cum te declari) ca da dovada de un umor inteligent

    2. eu as mai pune pe lista de faggoti pe ai mai mari: zoso, arhi, cateodata si visurat. Deh, gasca obisnuita

    3. e delicios articolul. O sa te urmaresc de-acum incolo

  24. Catalin
    Posted November 11, 2009 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    Ce sa zic? Multam. M-ai facut sa rosesc.
    Sper sa nu te dezamagesc pe viitor, nu toate articolele sunt scrise in stilul asta. :)

  25. Posted November 12, 2009 at 4:30 am | Permalink

    Si mie, ca si Narcisei, mi-a placut postul.
    Nu vad de ce s-ar ofensa cei mentionati. Daca nu poti sa faci fata criticilor negative (mai mult sau mai putin) si misto-urilor, atunci nu ti-ai ales meseria/pasiunea potrivita.

    Cat despre scrisul in engleza, eu sunt de parere ca unele fraze chiar suna mai natural in engleza. Nu vad de ce ar sari (doi “i”?) unii de popou in sus ca “nu se face”. Hai ca nu blogurile o sa salveze limba romana de englezisme, si atata timp cat coerenta ideilor e aceeasi in engleza ca si in romana, nu vad de ce nu te-ai exprima in ce limba iti e mai comod.

    So yeah!

  26. Catalin
    Posted November 12, 2009 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    So, thanks! :)
    Hell yeaaah.
    Legat de scrisul in engleza.. mie imi pare rau ca nu am citit articolul mai cu atentie inainte de publicare, altfel nu s=ar fi ajuns la discutii de genul asta. Sa fim seriosi, engleza mea nu e grozava, dar e mai buna decat romana muuultor bloggeri.

  27. Posted November 12, 2009 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    Catalin, incerc din nou să postez un comentariu. Ieri nu mi-a reusit şi-mi pare rău, fiindca mă revoltasem pe intervenţia celor care în loc să aprecieze şi eventual să completeze subiectul atat de interesant al postării, se rezumă la a diseca nodul din papură pentru nişte greşeli ce pot apare fie din graba cu care degetele aleargă pe tastatură, fie din cauza gândului care o ia înaintea scrisului, sau pur si simplu “scapă”.
    Te mai anunţasem că la mine pe blog a apărut Moş Craciun!

  28. Catalin
    Posted November 12, 2009 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    @Aura.. sa stii ca eu am apreciat foarte mult feedbackul de la Mircea. Sunt perfectionist si chiar eram ofticat ca am publicat articolul cu greseli in el.
    Comentariul lui Radu nu e constructiv, dar asta e stilul lui, e stilul care l-a consacrat, doar un “personaj”. Deci nu il lua in serios. :)

  29. Posted November 13, 2009 at 12:24 am | Permalink

    Hehehe, imi place ca te apara fanele de mine. E bine :)

    In rest, cum o zis Alex, ai castigat [cel putin o parte din] internetii anului in curs.

  30. Catalin
    Posted November 13, 2009 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    Mie mi se pare ca esti inofensiv (cel putin in raport cu mine), ma insel? :D
    Ce-i cu “totala.com”?

  31. Posted November 13, 2009 at 12:33 am | Permalink

    Ca mi-o fost lene sa scriu si-am zis “tot ala”.

  32. Posted November 13, 2009 at 1:22 am | Permalink

    catalin, nu-mi place deloc de tine. Nu vreau sa ies pe locul 3. Poti sa schimbi ordinea si sa-l pui pe radu pe 3 si sa schimbam locurile?

    Of course…doar daca asta implica sa nu fac eu nimic propriu – zis :) .

    Thx.

    P.S. vreau si o diploma, te rog :)

  33. Catalin
    Posted November 13, 2009 at 1:28 am | Permalink

    @totala.. aha. :D
    @Adrian.. asta inseamna “succes dublu” pentru tine? :)
    Mai negociem, deocamdata nu-ti pot oferi decat locul 1.5. :) )
    Oh, come on, nu cred ca vrei o diploma pe care sa scrie Fag. On second thought, it would be fun. Cine stie.. daca nimerim pe la acelasi meet vreodata..

    Ca sa vezi.. 3 reactii din 4. Doar Bad Pitzi mai tre’ sa intervina.

  34. Posted November 13, 2009 at 2:10 am | Permalink

    Link iti dau doar cand scrii de bine :) )

  35. Catalin
    Posted November 13, 2009 at 8:35 am | Permalink

    Pai unde-am cerut eu link? :-s

  36. Posted November 13, 2009 at 9:22 am | Permalink

    fag exista si in romana, se traduce fagotist

  37. Catalin
    Posted November 13, 2009 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    Un fag, doi fagi.. vorba lui de_ce
    Un fagot, doi fagoti (ma rog, doua fagoturi, ca e neutru :P )

  38. Posted March 10, 2010 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Hai c-acu am bagat si pizde, nu numa sanuri. Sa vaz acu’ ce mai inventezi, ca nec plus ultra fag.

  39. Catalin
    Posted March 10, 2010 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Chiar ca ultra fag. :) )
    Dar pe astea nu le-ai posedat, musai.

3 Trackbacks

  1. By polimedia.us/fain/ on November 10, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    Fag- You-re it – A blog on evolution…

    If you’re a fan of South Park, you probably know, by now, that on the historic date of October 21st, 2009 they changed the meaning of the word “fag”. It is no longer used as an pejorative term against gay people.
    (Mircea, pe asta chiar nu aveam cum sa-…

  2. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by alexblogu and alleks, Mihai Mateas. Mihai Mateas said: RT: @catalinpopa: Ce inseamna "fag" si cateva exemple de fags in blogosfera romaneasca http://reinvented.ro/?p=5580 [...]

  3. [...] « Fag! You’re it [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Subscribe without commenting